00663nam a2200217 4500008004100000245005200041210005100093260002300144653001100167653002500178653001200203653001300215653002600228653001100254653003800265653001400303653000900317653001400326100002300340856008200363 2005 eng d00aInternet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life0 aInternet Society The Internet in Everyday Life aLondonbSagec200510aagency10aaudience ethnography10aBakhtin10aFeenberg10alittle behavior genre10aSchutz10asocial construction of technology10ause genre10auser10aVolosinov1 aBakardjieva, Maria uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/internet-society-internet-everyday-life00817nam a2200265 4500008004100000020001800041245007000059210006500129260006700194653001400261653001900275653001200294653001200306653001400318653001000332653001200342653001500354653001200369653001500381653001200396653001400408653001200422100002200434856009500456 1994 eng d a0-271-02570-000aThe Ideology of Genre: A Comparative Study of Generic Instability0 aIdeology of Genre A Comparative Study of Generic Instability aUniversity Park, PAbPennsylvania State University Pressc199410aAlthusser10aars dictaminis10aBakhtin10aDerrida10aevolution10agenre10aJameson10aliterature10aromance10aspeech act10aTodorov10ause-value10aWestern1 aBeebee, Thomas, O uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/ideology-genre-comparative-study-generic-instability00444nas a2200181 4500008004100000245001900041210001900060260000900079300001200088490000700100653001900107653001300126653001900139653001700158653001500175100001500190856005700205 2006 eng d00aClassification0 aClassification c2006 a21–500 v2310aclassification10aidentity10arepresentation10asubjectivity10auniversals1 aBoyne, Roy uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/classification00562nas a2200169 4500008004100000245006900041210006800110260000900178300001400187490000700201653002400208653001700232653002200249653001100271100002000282856009000302 2008 eng d00aTaking Up Space: On Genre Systems as Geographies of the Possible0 aTaking Up Space On Genre Systems as Geographies of the Possible c2008 a503–5340 v2810adocumentary society10agenre system10aland-use planning10auptake1 aDryer, Dylan, B uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/taking-space-genre-systems-geographies-possible00507nas a2200145 4500008004100000245007700041210006900118260000900187300001000196490000700206653001000213653001100223100002000234856010700254 2008 eng d00aThe Persistence of Institutional Memory: Genre Uptake and Program Reform0 aPersistence of Institutional Memory Genre Uptake and Program Ref c2008 a32-510 v3`10agenre10auptake1 aDryer, Dylan, B uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/persistence-institutional-memory-genre-uptake-and-program-reform01420nas a2200217 4500008004100000245009300041210006900134260003000203300001200233520067600245653001500921653001000936653002100946653001800967653002700985100002801012700001701040700001201057700001901069856011401088 2019 eng d00aGestural Silence: An engagement device in the multimodal genre of the chalk talk lecture0 aGestural Silence An engagement device in the multimodal genre of aAmsterdambJohn Benjamins a277-2963 a
This chapter reports on a study of multimodal engagement strategies used by instructors while performing chalk talk, the genre of university mathematics lecture. Relying on multimodal data, the study examines how university mathematics instructors engage students in chalk talk through gestures, writing on the chalkboard, and speech. One of the engagement strategies identified in the study is the use of gestural silence, or the absence of the instructor’s hand movement, intended to engage students in doing mathematics. The study indicates that such multimodal engagement strategies appear to be shaped by the embodied nature of discipline-specific genres.
10aengagement10agenre10agestural silence10amultimodality10auniversity mathematics1 aFogarty-Bourget, C., G.1 aArtemeva, N.1 aFox, J.1 aGuinda, C., S. uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/content/gestural-silence-engagement-device-multimodal-genre-chalk-talk-lecture00593nas a2200193 4500008004100000245005500041210005400096250004000150260002500190300001100215653000900226653001100235653001000246653001500256653001100271653001100282100002100293856008500314 2009 eng d00aSituating the Public Social Actions of Blog Posts 0 aSituating the Public Social Actions of Blog Posts aJanet Giltrow and Dieter Stein, eds aAmsterdambBenjamins a85-11110ablog10aCanada10agenre10aliterature10apublic10auptake1 aGrafton, Kathryn uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/situating-public-social-actions-blog-posts01521nas a2200217 4500008004100000245005900041210005900100260000900159300001200168490000600180520091900186653000901105653001401114653001001128653001501138653001101153653001101164100002101175700002201196856008501218 2007 eng d00aEngaging with and Arranging for Publics in Blog Genres0 aEngaging with and Arranging for Publics in Blog Genres c2007 a47–660 v33 aIn this paper, we take a rhetorical approach to weblogs, examining two sets of blogs:blogs responding to a national literary event called Canada Reads and ‘homeless blogs’. Taking up Miller and Shepherd’s proposal (2004) that the exigence of the blog is self cultivation and validation, we examine how such an exigence may be met, not through entering and building community, but engaging with and arranging for recognition in what Michael Warner calls ‘discursive publics’ (2002:121). By focusing on uptake (Freadman 2002) as a public dynamic, we suggest how features of the blog such as blog posts and ‘meta-generic’ commentary (Giltrow 2002:192) about antecedent genres may enable a blogger to legitimate the self as an integral part and perpetuator of publics: a blogger’s uptake both actualizes a public (declaring membership), and imagines it anew (envisioning subsequent uptakes). 10ablog10acommunity10agenre10ameta-genre10apublic10auptake1 aGrafton, Kathryn1 aMaurer, Elizabeth uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/engaging-and-arranging-publics-blog-genres00612nas a2200145 4500008004100000245011900041210006900160300001400229490000700243653002100250653001900271653001100290100001600301856014900317 2008 eng d00aConvention and inventiveness in an occluded academic genre: A case study of retention–promotion–tenure reports0 aConvention and inventiveness in an occluded academic genre A cas a175–1920 v2710aacademic writing10aoccluded genre10auptake1 aHyon, Sunny uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/convention-and-inventiveness-occluded-academic-genre-case-study-retention%E2%80%93promotion%E2%80%93tenure02397nas a2200217 4500008004100000245012700041210006900168490000700237520167100244653002001915653000801935653003001943653001801973653002701991653001102018653002902029653002702058653000702085100001802092856006902110 2016 eng d00aCMSs, Bittorrent Trackers and Large-Scale Rhetorical Genres: Analyzing Collective Activity in Participatory Digital Spaces0 aCMSs Bittorrent Trackers and LargeScale Rhetorical Genres Analyz0 v463 aScholars of rhetoric and writing have long recognized the mediated nature of rhetorical action. From Plato’s early indictments of writing as enemy of memoria to Burke’s recognition of instrumental causes to recent analyses of digital mediation (Haas 1996; Spinuzzi 2008; Swarts 2008; Ittersum and Ching 2013), the study of meaning-making refuses one-to-one, transparent theories of communication, instead recognizing that there’s more to rhetorical action than humans. This article follows the trail of Haas, Swarts and others, arguing that analyses of mediation uncover much about human motives, digital communities and rhetorical action. I argue that technologies often function as rhetorical genres, providing what Miller characterizes as “typified rhetorical actions based in recurrent situations” that occur in uniquely digital spaces (159). Working from sites of participatory archival creation and curation[1], I argue that invisible rhetorical genres operating at macroscopic levels of scale are central to shaping individual and communal activity in sites of distributed social production. To support this claim, I investigate two applications – a content management system (CMS) called Gazelle and a bittorrent tracker called Ocelot – to demonstrate how largely invisible server-side software shapes rhetorical action, circumscribes individual agency and cultivates community identity in sites of participatory archival curation. By articulating CMSs and other macroscopic software as rhetorical genres, I hope to extend nascent investigations into the medial capacities of digital tools that shape our collective digital experience.
10aactivity theory10aCMS10acontent management system10adigital tools10aparticipatory archives10apiracy10arhetorical genre studies10auser-experience design10aUX1 aLewis, Justin uhttp://jtw.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/09/09/004728161560063401904nas a2200301 4500008004100000020001800041245002100059210002100080260002300101300001400124520112000138653001301258653001401271653002001285653001701305653001901322653001801341653001301359653001801372653001401390653001101404653001401415100002301429700002201452700001401474700002001488856009401508 2016 eng d a978311025547800aDiscourse Genres0 aDiscourse Genres aBerlinbDe Gruyter a269–2863 aGenre marks large-scale repeated patterns of meaning in human symbolic production and interaction. Approaches to genre can be divided into the formalistthematic, attending to categories and discriminations based on linguistic or textual elements and drawing from cognitive theories; and the pragmatic, attending primarily to use-patterns drawing from social theories of function, action, and communal interaction. This overview draws from disciplines explicitly concerned with natural language, including literature, rhetoric, and several areas of linguistics. A distinction between rational and empirical approaches to genre affects both how genre is conceived and what methods are used for analysis. The rational approach grounds genre in a principle or theory determined by the theorist, yielding a relatively small, closed set of genres; the empirical grounds genre in the experience of those for whom genres are significant, yielding an historically changing, open set of genres. Genre analysis is applied in many discourse disciplines and for a variety of purposes, both descriptive and prescriptive.
10aexigence10aformalism10agenre awareness10agenre system10amacrostructure10amove analysis10arhetoric10asocial action10aText type10auptake10autterance1 aMiller, Carolyn, R1 aKelly, Ashley, R.1 aRocci, A.1 ade Saussure, L. uhttp://www.degruyter.com/view/books/9783110255478/9783110255478-015/9783110255478-015.xml01679nas a2200241 4500008004100000245010700041210006900148260000900217300001600226490000700242520091100249653001101160653001001171653002401181653001301205653001701218653001201235653000901247653000801256100002101264700002201285856013001307 2008 eng d00aClassifying Web Genres in Context: A Case Study Documenting the Web Genres Used by a Software Engineer0 aClassifying Web Genres in Context A Case Study Documenting the W c2008 a1410–14300 v443 aThis case study analyzes the Internet-based resources that a software engineer uses in his daily work. Methodologically,we studied the web browser history of the participant, classifying all the web pages he had seen over a period of 12 days into web genres. We interviewed him before and after the analysis of the web browser history. In the first interview, he spoke about his general information behavior; in the second, he commented on each web genre, explaining why and how he used them. As a result, three approaches allow us to describe the set of 23 web genres obtained: (a) the purposes they serve for the participant; (b) the role they play in the various work and search phases; (c) and the way they are used in combination with each other. Further observations concern the way the participant assesses quality of web-based resources, and his information behavior as a software engineer. 10aaccess10agenre10ainformation science10ainternet10aprofessional10apurpose10auser10aweb1 aMontesi, Michela1 aNavarrete, Trilce uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/classifying-web-genres-context-case-study-documenting-web-genres-used-software-engineer00752nas a2200241 4500008004100000245005900041210005800100260004700158300001400205490000700219653003200226653001900258653001000277653001300287653001800300653000800318100001900326700002300345700002000368700002200388700002000410856008000430 2001 eng d00aGenres from the Bottom Up: What Has the Web Brought Us0 aGenres from the Bottom Up What Has the Web Brought Us aMedford, NJbInformation Today, Inc.c2001 a330–3390 v3810aautomated genre recognition10aclassification10agenre10ainternet10auser behavior10aweb1 aNilan, Michael1 aPomerantz, Jeffrey1 aPaling, Stephen1 aAversa, Elizabeth1 aManley, Cynthia uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/genres-bottom-what-has-web-brought-us02016nas a2200193 4500008004100000245006200041210006100103300001400164490000700178520143200185653001601617653001801633653002601651653001301677653001001690653001101700100001501711856009601726 2013 eng d00aMore than Just Remixing: Uptake and New Media Composition0 aMore than Just Remixing Uptake and New Media Composition a183–1960 v303 aThis article turns to genre theory's recent explorations of uptake, broadly defined as the ways genres interact, as a resource for sketching a pedagogy of shuttling between genres. Using uptake, I intend to reconceptualize multimodal compositions as a means of participating in rhetorical ecologies that consist of transactions between genres instead of thinking of remixes as an end in themselves. In this article, I first define the concept of uptake in detail and discuss its use in rhetorical genre studies. After further illustrating uptake through an analysis of transactions between YouTube parodies and the 2005 German language film Downfall, I discuss existing scholarship in multimodal composition that draws on genre but not the idea of uptake in order to lay a foundation for a pedagogy that highlights the links, feedbacks, and rules that coordinate genres. My aim in the last section is to sketch possibilities for how teachers and students can deploy the concept of uptake as a rhetorical tool to strengthen their awareness of genre and multimodality. In doing this, I hope to reposition multimodal projects as beginnings or midpoints that lead to students’ emersion into public discourse rather than culminations or end goals in themselves. Integrating studies of uptake into writing curricula in this way will help students to make sophisticated rhetorical decisions in the age of media convergence.
10aconvergence10amultimodality10anew media composition10apedagogy10aremix10auptake1 aRay, Brian uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/more-just-remixing-uptake-and-new-media-composition-000564nas a2200181 4500008004100000245005800041210005700099260000900156300001200165490000700177653002100184653001000205653001400215653002600229653002300255100001800278856008600296 1996 eng d00aPresidential Inaugurals: The Modernization of a Genre0 aPresidential Inaugurals The Modernization of a Genre c1996 a81–920 v1310acontent analysis10agenre10ainaugural10apresidential rhetoric10aunification symbol1 aSigelman, Lee uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/presidential-inaugurals-modernization-genre00688nam a2200193 4500008004100000245008200041210006900123260003500192653002000227653001300247653001000260653002300270653000900293100001900302700001800321700002300339700001800362856011400380 2003 eng d00aTracing Genres through Organizations: A Sociocultural Approach to Information0 aTracing Genres through Organizations A Sociocultural Approach to aCambridge, MAbMIT Pressc200310aactivity system10aartifact10agenre10ainformation design10auser1 aSpinuzzi, Clay1 aNardi, Bonnie1 aKaptelinin, Viktor1 aFoot, Kirsten uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/tracing-genres-through-organizations-sociocultural-approach-information00735nas a2200205 4500008004100000245013300041210006900174260000900243300001400252490000700266653001200273653001500285653001000300653001400310653001400324653001500338100002200353700001900375856013500394 2006 eng d00aWhy Structure and Genre Matter for Users of Digital Information: A Longitudinal Experiment with Readers of a Web-Based Newspaper0 aWhy Structure and Genre Matter for Users of Digital Information c2006 a502–5260 v6410adigital10aexperiment10agenre10astructure10ausability10aweb design1 aVaughan, Misha, W1 aDillon, Andrew uhttps://genreacrossborders.org/biblio/why-structure-and-genre-matter-users-digital-information-longitudinal-experiment-readers-web